M30B35 Swap FAQ

E28 technical advice asked and given! Troubleshooting, modifications and more.
Bimmerguy2002
Posts: 11938
Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
Location: Lodi, California

Post by Bimmerguy2002 »

Sam, im running the M30B35 mount, as well as the E32/E34 alternator and the E32/E34 M30B35 powersteering pump, all from the E32 735i/E34 535i. No problmes whatsoever, you will obviously have to have all the complete hardware, other than that the holes for feed and return on the pump itself are the same 19mm and 22mm head hex bolts. No problems here, maybe it was because my old pump was going out but steering seems lighter (my old one whined a little).

I did no research whatsoever and just ran it, works fine. I guess if you wanted to you could find the info from the manufacturer or the repair manual.
draztik
Posts: 233
Joined: Dec 12, 2007 12:38 AM
Location: Long Island, NY

Post by draztik »

I would also like to confirm that the e32/e34 m30b35 oil pan fits fine.
MrNic3Guy
Posts: 925
Joined: Dec 15, 2008 1:55 AM
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by MrNic3Guy »

That's amazing bud! Thanks a lot for taking the time to write a incredible write-up. I've learned something new today.

5 bananas! :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
Brad D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

draztik wrote:I would also like to confirm that the e32/e34 m30b35 oil pan fits fine.
Matt (Bimmerguy2002) has confirmed that the e32/34 pan WILL work. It also sits about 1/2" higher than the b34 pan according to him.
SamSpade
Posts: 229
Joined: Dec 17, 2008 6:07 PM

Post by SamSpade »

Big Bronze Rim wrote:
draztik wrote:I would also like to confirm that the e32/e34 m30b35 oil pan fits fine.
Matt (Bimmerguy2002) has confirmed that the e32/34 pan WILL work. It also sits about 1/2" higher than the b34 pan according to him.
Now I am thoroughly confused. I thought we had to use the old B34 pan (and B34 oil pump pickup) in place of the e32/e34 B35 pan because of subframe clearance issues.

Yes, e32/34 b35 oil pan fits: Bimmerguy2002, draztik
No, need to use old b34 pan: ismellfish2, Shawn D.
Shawn D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 22082
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Contact:

Post by Shawn D. »

SamSpade wrote:Now I am thoroughly confused. I thought we had to use the old B34 pan (and B34 oil pump pickup) in place of the e32/e34 B35 pan because of subframe clearance issues.

Yes, e32/34 b35 oil pan fits: Bimmerguy2002, draztik
No, need to use old b34 pan: ismellfish2, Shawn D.
It's important to note the order of the comments. Matt corrected me after I made my comment. Matt has proven that the E32/34 oil pan fits and covers the flywheel.
Jean
Posts: 562
Joined: Nov 30, 2007 11:37 AM
Location: Sacramento

Post by Jean »

Bradley - thank you for the wiring diagram.

After looking at the e28 vs e30 c101 I see that they are different :( My luck :bawl:

http://www.briangt.com/gallery/albums/a ... 8iC101.jpg
Jay Bee
Posts: 39
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 6:15 AM
Location: Netherlands

Post by Jay Bee »

I'm messing around with my wiringloom in my e28.
It was originally an euro m535 with abs.
I compared my c101 with the one from Brad.

I do have a pin9 wire?????
i dont have the 16 and 17, but thats not so important.

I was wondering, what does number 9 do.
I downloaded some scheme's but cant find out what the niner does.
washington
Posts: 1
Joined: May 02, 2009 7:26 AM

Re: M30B35 Swap FAQ

Post by washington »

Big Bronze Rim wrote:The b35 obviously makes more power and has a smoother torque curve.
Yes it does BUT the majority of the power is in the engine management system. Using the old low compression motor is best (if you can find the right block) The 3.5's with the domed pistons have issues I stay away from. Using an old 3.5 with the updated motronic will get you way more power but you do loose a little becasue of the engine.
Jay Bee
Posts: 39
Joined: Dec 07, 2008 6:15 AM
Location: Netherlands

Post by Jay Bee »

Washington, i did read the entire topic.

My car is a euro m535 11th april 1985
It does have abs.

I like to know what pin 9 does of the c101 fuse box connector.
In Brad's lay out it schould be empty but my e28 has a wire.
I dont think the data from the new engine is important.
Because the e34 wire is almost the same as in Brad's scheme.
Brad D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Re: M30B35 Swap FAQ

Post by Brad D. »

washington wrote:Yes it does BUT the majority of the power is in the engine management system. Using the old low compression motor is best (if you can find the right block) The 3.5's with the domed pistons have issues I stay away from. Using an old 3.5 with the updated motronic will get you way more power but you do loose a little becasue of the engine.
I disagree. The b35 head and cam are far superior to the b34 components.The combustion chamber design also seems to be a touch better as wel, requiring less timing tha a b34. A FI b35 will consistently make more power than a b34 with both running Megasquit. This is due to the better head, cam and higher CR. Also 9:1 CR is perfectly fine for a DD FI car.
SamSpade
Posts: 229
Joined: Dec 17, 2008 6:07 PM

Post by SamSpade »

I had to shave off 0.3 mm from the M30B35 head. Can I use the stock headgasket (11-12-1-730-223) or should I use the oversize +0.3mm one (11-12-1-730-224)?

I already have the 223 so if there aren't any issues using it I wouldn't want to buy the oversize.
john1180
Posts: 7
Joined: Feb 25, 2009 4:09 PM

Post by john1180 »

Could you tell me what the number is on the preferred 1.3 DME?
Brad D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 10735
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Post by Brad D. »

179
Mark Goddard
Posts: 49
Joined: Nov 12, 2008 1:09 PM
Location: Canada

M30B34 ? with Motronic in a Euro E12

Post by Mark Goddard »

Hi,

Been reading this post with interest, I have a euro spec E12 with later E28 mechanicals, my engine has the B34 type manifolds, it has the BMW roundall on the cam cover, and 3.2-3.5 on the intake, its pointing the finger at being the 182 bhp B34, which is a shame because when I bought the car I thought it was the full 3.5. Im wondering if im running the 1.0 DME or the 1.3, from the posts I need to look for 179 or equivalent, any more tips on identifying what ive got,
Car has stiffer suspension/lowered slightly, full E28 rear subframe and a 7 series LSD,

Thanks
Bimmerguy2002
Posts: 11938
Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
Location: Lodi, California

Post by Bimmerguy2002 »

The only way you would have 1.3 would be if you didnt have a cold start valve, reference sensors on the tranny, etc...
You would have a crank trigger on the passenger side of the balancer.
Mark Goddard
Posts: 49
Joined: Nov 12, 2008 1:09 PM
Location: Canada

Crank sensor and cold start

Post by Mark Goddard »

I have what I think is a crank sensor, if its at the front of the engine, looks like a big metal disc about 9" across, about 1/2" thick, has a peg sticking out of it then a sensor on a bracket. But, I also have a cold start valve, I know that because it was disconnected when I bought the car and it was hard to start on a cold day, have I got a mix of 2 systems,
Bimmerguy2002
Posts: 11938
Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
Location: Lodi, California

Post by Bimmerguy2002 »

You need to look further, i forgot to emphasize that the harmonic balancer has teeth on it. 1.3 does NOT have any kind of provision for a cold start valve.
Shawn D.
Beamter
Beamter
Posts: 22082
Joined: Feb 12, 2006 12:00 PM
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Contact:

Re: Crank sensor and cold start

Post by Shawn D. »

Mark Goddard wrote:I have what I think is a crank sensor, if its at the front of the engine, looks like a big metal disc about 9" across, about 1/2" thick, has a peg sticking out of it then a sensor on a bracket. But, I also have a cold start valve, I know that because it was disconnected when I bought the car and it was hard to start on a cold day, have I got a mix of 2 systems,
That is not a B35 harmonic balancer -- that's a B34 balancer. The B34 has the single peg, the B35 has the "60-2" wheel that looks like a square-toothed gear with two teeth missing.
Mark Goddard
Posts: 49
Joined: Nov 12, 2008 1:09 PM
Location: Canada

Its an M30B34 ??

Post by Mark Goddard »

So its looking like I have an M30B34, I believe these came in different BHP ranges, my head has 86 stamped on it, so im thinking its a 1986 engine. I heard that the 182 BHP has dished pistons, ive tried to feel with weld wire down the spark plug hole with no success. Is there a way to determine BHP physically any other way, I think ive read that some 1986 B34's had 208 BHP, how can I tell.
Bimmerguy2002
Posts: 11938
Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
Location: Lodi, California

Post by Bimmerguy2002 »

The US b34s came with 182 HP, no matter what year.
Mark Goddard
Posts: 49
Joined: Nov 12, 2008 1:09 PM
Location: Canada

Euro spec B34

Post by Mark Goddard »

So if my engine was advertised as a euro spec, chances are it may not be, ie where would a Euro spec B34 come from in Canada. Im wondering why it would have been swapped from the 2.8 that was in it unless the engine was toast, this US spec probably isnt that much more powerful than the original 2.8, however torque/reliability/parts availability may be better.
Zaffer
Posts: 319
Joined: May 23, 2006 12:19 PM
Location: Richmond, VA

Post by Zaffer »

I would like a little more elaboration on the pinning of the harness. I take it if I were to do the swap, I would use the plugs off my old engine harness and put them on the 1.3 harness. Is this correct?

Also, to reiterate another question above, is it possible to use the trans. out of the e32/e34 without having to modify the rest of the drive train, or does one have to stick with the trans. that came in the e28?
Bimmerguy2002
Posts: 11938
Joined: Oct 03, 2007 3:04 PM
Location: Lodi, California

Post by Bimmerguy2002 »

Brad could clear up the E34 harness, but the super eta harness you just extend wires and thats all. You dont use anything from the 1.0 harness with that since it would be obsolete.
Canuck YYC
Posts: 332
Joined: Oct 06, 2008 10:03 PM
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Re: Euro spec B34

Post by Canuck YYC »

Mark Goddard wrote:So if my engine was advertised as a euro spec, chances are it may not be, ie where would a Euro spec B34 come from in Canada. Im wondering why it would have been swapped from the 2.8 that was in it unless the engine was toast, this US spec probably isnt that much more powerful than the original 2.8, however torque/reliability/parts availability may be better.
Euro-spec engines aren't impossible to find - rare, but not impossible. Don't forget that E28/E12 owners are somewhat rare and cultish - the general population doesn't see what we see in these cars (and they sure aren't willing to spend the time and money to repair/maintain them). Thus, when grandad's imported 635i falls through the maintenance cracks and ends up in the hands of young-n-dumb Billy, it's only a matter of time before that Euro 3.5 shows up on Kijiji or Craigslist somewhere.

In the E12 world, the B34 swap is more exalted than the B35 swap into an E28 is here. Unless you managed to score one of the few 535i E12s, you ran the 2.8L North American (read emission choked) with somewhat less than the 165hp of the Euro cars. If you truly have a Euro 3.5, they're rated at 218hp - that's a pretty substantial jump and well worth the swap.
Post Reply